Why Parallelize?
Why Parallelization Matters
In a quantum datacenter with CPUs, GPUs, and QPUs all available, the worst thing you can do is use one resource at a time. Quantum algorithms are inherently parallel — they generate large batches of circuits that can and should be distributed across every available backend simultaneously.
Quantum Algorithms Generate Many Circuits
Most practical quantum algorithms don’t run a single circuit. They run hundreds or thousands:
| Algorithm | Why It Generates Many Circuits |
|---|---|
| VQE | Each optimization iteration evaluates the Hamiltonian across multiple measurement bases |
| QAOA | Parameter optimization requires repeated circuit evaluations; gradient methods double the count |
| Time Evolution | Multiple Trotter steps, ensemble averaging for QDrift, trajectories across time points |
| Circuit Cutting | A single large circuit is split into many smaller sub-circuits |
Running these sequentially — one circuit after another on one device — wastes the very infrastructure a quantum datacenter provides.
Hardware Is the Bottleneck
Today’s quantum hardware introduces delays at every step:
- Queue times: Cloud QPUs can have minutes-long wait times per job
- Calibration drift: Hardware properties change, so faster execution means more reliable results
- Limited qubits: No single device can handle the full problem — partitioning is necessary
The only way to overcome these constraints is to saturate all available resources in parallel.
What Parallelization Looks Like
Qoro’s platform parallelizes at every level:
- Problem decomposition — Large optimization problems are partitioned into sub-problems that fit on available hardware
- Circuit batching — Hundreds of circuits from a single algorithm iteration are dispatched simultaneously
- Gradient parallelism — Parameter-shift gradient circuits are generated and executed in parallel, not sequentially
- Multi-backend distribution — Circuits are routed to simulators, GPUs, and QPUs concurrently based on their characteristics
- Classical overlap — Classical post-processing and parameter updates happen while the next batch of circuits is already running
The Result
Instead of a sequential loop that waits for each circuit to complete before submitting the next, Qoro’s stack keeps every resource busy:
flowchart LR
A["Algorithm generates 200 circuits"] --> B["Batch dispatcher"]
B --> C["Maestro (GPU sim)"]
B --> D["IBM QPU"]
B --> E["IQM QPU"]
B --> F["Local simulator"]
C --> G["Result aggregation"]
D --> G
E --> G
F --> G
G --> H["Next optimization iteration"]
H --> A
This is why Divi, Composer, and Maestro exist — to turn a collection of heterogeneous quantum and classical resources into a single, high-throughput execution engine.